Solutions / Sector and country heatmap

For asset managers, consultants and pension funds

Don’t judge a company by its sector.

Whole sectors get excluded, and whole sectors get treated as safe. Both are assumptions. Technology holds companies with critical determinations and companies with none — so does energy, and so does every sector here. This shows the spread inside each sector and country: how many are clean, how many carry determinations, how many cross the exclusion bar. A mandate can then screen on what a company has actually done rather than on the label above it.

Scope: 33 sectors
Coverage: 2,578 companies in scope
Filter: Global or one country
Output: Report, CSV, API
Built for: Asset managers · Consultants · Pension funds

The sector profile, on this page

Every cell is a share of a named population. Where coverage is thin the row is flagged rather than coloured with confidence.

Subscribe →

Universe screen · sector

Sector Profile

the adjudicated profile of each sector, filterable to one country — every cell a share of a named population

Sectors

6 below the 20-company floor

Companies

2,835

carrying a sector on this view

Coloured cells

the rest are shown, not hidden

Scope

Global

4 buckets · 13 countries clear the floor

Every cell is a share of an adjudicated population, and opens to the companies inside it. No ESG score and no controversy index appear anywhere on this page. A cell below 20 companies is drawn without colour and shows its count.

Sector by country · click any row for the companies behind it

33 sectors, 2,835 companies

Our adverse regulators are US, UK and EU — competition, securities and anti-bribery authorities, plus US environmental and workplace-safety regulators. A country outside that reach will look emptier here than it is, and a low Coverage figure is the visible form of that. Global is the default for the same reason.

Global 2,835

35 further countries (196 companies) fall below the 20-company floor and are not offered as their own view. They are counted in Global, not excluded from it — largest first: BEL (18), ESP (17), AUS (14), NOR (14), ISR (14), POL (14). 1 company carries no country at all and appears only in Global. The buckets above are how these 196 become visible: grouped, rather than split into slivers that each fall below the floor.

Sector

Companies

Adverse

Elevated

Watch

Leaders

Changed (12m)

Financial Services

271

6%15 companies

13%36 companies

47%128 companies

0%none

6%17 companies

3%7 companies

12%32 companies

14%37 companies

▸

Companies in this cell (271)

Company	Band	Why — the rule that fired	Pillars	Determinations	Positive evidence
ALPHABET INC	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — DGCOMP litigated determination, 2025-09-05	G	3	2	▸

BLACKSTONE INC	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2025-01-13	ESG	6		▸

CANACCORD GENUITY GROUP INC	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2024-09-24	G	2		▸

CARLYLE FINANCE LLC	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2025-01-13	G	1		▸

HILLTOP HOLDINGS INC	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2024-08-14	G	1		▸

Showing 5 of 271 companies. Scroll down to unlock the full report and see them all, with the determination and source behind each.

Every figure in this row is a share of these companies. There is no score here and no controversy index: a cell is a proportion of a named population, and this is that population.

Software and Computer Services

196

0%none

11%22 companies

36%71 companies

0%none

2%4 companies

2%3 companies

8%16 companies

21%41 companies

▸

Companies in this cell (196)

Company	Band	Why — the rule that fired	Pillars	Determinations	Positive evidence
AMAZON.COM INC	Elevated	EPA consent determination, severity 52, 2022-10-19 · 4 in window	E	4		▸

APPFOLIO INC	Elevated	SEC consent determination, severity 45, 2024-09-09	G	1		▸

BLACKBAUD INC	Elevated	SEC consent determination, severity 45, 2023-03-09	G	1	1	▸

C3.AI INC	Elevated	MSHA consent determination, severity 54, 2024-07-05 · 4 in window	S	4		▸

COINBASE GLOBAL INC	Elevated	FCA consent determination, severity 57, 2024-07-23	G	1		▸

Showing 5 of 196 companies. Scroll down to unlock the full report and see them all, with the determination and source behind each.

Every figure in this row is a share of these companies. There is no score here and no controversy index: a cell is a proportion of a named population, and this is that population.

Banks

146

14%21 companies

6%9 companies

67%98 companies

0%none

1%2 companies

1%1 company

19%28 companies

14%20 companies

▸

Companies in this cell (146)

Company	Band	Why — the rule that fired	Pillars	Determinations	Positive evidence
BANK OF AMERICA CORP	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2022-09-27	EG	2	2	▸

BANK OF MONTREAL	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2023-08-08	G	2		▸

BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2023-05-11	G	2		▸

BNP PARIBAS	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2023-08-08	G	1	2	▸

CITIGROUP INC	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2022-09-27	G	5	1	▸

Showing 5 of 146 companies. Scroll down to unlock the full report and see them all, with the determination and source behind each.

Every figure in this row is a share of these companies. There is no score here and no controversy index: a cell is a proportion of a named population, and this is that population.

Personal and Household Goods

140

4%5 companies

13%18 companies

34%48 companies

0%none

11%16 companies

2%3 companies

4%6 companies

21%30 companies

▸

Companies in this cell (140)

Company	Band	Why — the rule that fired	Pillars	Determinations	Positive evidence
BRUNSWICK CORP	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2022-09-29	E	1	1	▸

COMPAGNIE FINANCIERE RICHEMO	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — DGCOMP litigated determination, 2025-10-14	G	1	2	▸

ESSILORLUXOTTICA SOCIETE	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — ADLC litigated determination, 2022-10-06	G	1	1	▸

PROCTER & GAMBLE CO	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2022-09-29	E	4	2	▸

THOR INDUSTRIES INC	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — SEC litigated determination, 2023-10-19	G	1	2	▸

Showing 5 of 140 companies. Scroll down to unlock the full report and see them all, with the determination and source behind each.

Every figure in this row is a share of these companies. There is no score here and no controversy index: a cell is a proportion of a named population, and this is that population.

Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

140

1%2 companies

16%22 companies

61%85 companies

1%1 company

11%16 companies

1%1 company

5%7 companies

9%12 companies

▸

Companies in this cell (140)

Company	Band	Why — the rule that fired	Pillars	Determinations	Positive evidence
NUTRA PHARMA CORP	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — SEC litigated determination, 2024-08-30	G	1		▸

PFIZER INC	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2022-09-29	E	9	2	▸

ABBVIE INC	Elevated	EPA final uncontested determination, severity 38, 2022-08-01	E	1	2	▸

ALNYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS INC	Elevated	EPA consent determination, severity 50, 2024-12-26	E	1		▸

AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS INC	Elevated	SEC consent determination, severity 45, 2025-08-12	G	1		▸

Showing 5 of 140 companies. Scroll down to unlock the full report and see them all, with the determination and source behind each.

Every figure in this row is a share of these companies. There is no score here and no controversy index: a cell is a proportion of a named population, and this is that population.

Support Services (Industrial Goods and Services)

137

2%3 companies

12%17 companies

52%71 companies

0%none

4%6 companies

4%5 companies

7%9 companies

15%20 companies

▸

Companies in this cell (137)

Company	Band	Why — the rule that fired	Pillars	Determinations	Positive evidence
ACCIONA SA	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — CNMC litigated determination, 2022-07-05	G	1	3	▸

MOODY'S CORP	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2024-09-03	G	2	2	▸

SECHE ENVIRONNEMENT	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — ADLC litigated determination, 2022-03-03	G	1		▸

AB DYNAMICS PLC	Elevated	EPA consent determination, severity 50, 2025-02-05	E	1		▸

ACCESS NEWSWIRE INC	Elevated	SEC consent determination, severity 45, 2024-12-16	G	1		▸

Showing 5 of 137 companies. Scroll down to unlock the full report and see them all, with the determination and source behind each.

Every figure in this row is a share of these companies. There is no score here and no controversy index: a cell is a proportion of a named population, and this is that population.

Oil and Gas

133

5%6 companies

29%39 companies

47%63 companies

0%none

26%34 companies

10%13 companies

4%5 companies

26%34 companies

▸

Companies in this cell (133)

Company	Band	Why — the rule that fired	Pillars	Determinations	Positive evidence
BP PLC	Adverse	EPA consent determination, severity 69, 2023-08-09	E	3	1	▸

CHEVRON CORP	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2023-09-19	ES	14		▸

CONOCOPHILLIPS	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2024-09-17	E	5	1	▸

HALLIBURTON CO	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2022-09-29	ES	9		▸

MPLX LP	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2025-06-27	E	3		▸

Showing 5 of 133 companies. Scroll down to unlock the full report and see them all, with the determination and source behind each.

Every figure in this row is a share of these companies. There is no score here and no controversy index: a cell is a proportion of a named population, and this is that population.

Construction and Materials

132

2%2 companies

38%50 companies

42%55 companies

0%none

20%27 companies

24%32 companies

1%1 company

26%34 companies

▸

Companies in this cell (132)

Company	Band	Why — the rule that fired	Pillars	Determinations	Positive evidence
HERCULES PLC	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2022-12-08	E	3		▸

TRANE TECHNOLOGIES PLC	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2022-09-29	E	3	3	▸

AMERESCO INC	Elevated	EPA consent determination, severity 61, 2024-10-02	E	1		▸

API GROUP CORP	Elevated	EPA consent determination, severity 50, 2025-04-01 · 7 in window	ES	7		▸

APOGEE ENTERPRISES INC	Elevated	EPA consent determination, severity 58, 2025-05-01	E	1		▸

Showing 5 of 132 companies. Scroll down to unlock the full report and see them all, with the determination and source behind each.

Every figure in this row is a share of these companies. There is no score here and no controversy index: a cell is a proportion of a named population, and this is that population.

Retail

126

2%3 companies

15%19 companies

50%63 companies

0%none

12%15 companies

2%3 companies

3%4 companies

19%24 companies

▸

Companies in this cell (126)

Company	Band	Why — the rule that fired	Pillars	Determinations	Positive evidence
HONDA MOTOR CO LTD	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — DGCOMP determination, 2025-04-01	G	1		▸

LOWE'S COS INC	Adverse	EPA consent determination, severity 69, 2026-07-08	E	3		▸

STELLANTIS NV	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — DGCOMP determination, 2025-04-01	G	1	3	▸

ADVANCE AUTO PARTS INC	Elevated	EPA consent determination, severity 55, 2023-06-02	E	1	1	▸

AUTOZONE INC	Elevated	EPA consent determination, severity 56, 2023-07-20	E	1		▸

Showing 5 of 126 companies. Scroll down to unlock the full report and see them all, with the determination and source behind each.

Every figure in this row is a share of these companies. There is no score here and no controversy index: a cell is a proportion of a named population, and this is that population.

Health Care Equipment and Services

124

1%1 company

10%12 companies

66%82 companies

0%none

7%9 companies

2%2 companies

3%4 companies

8%10 companies

▸

Companies in this cell (124)

Company	Band	Why — the rule that fired	Pillars	Determinations	Positive evidence
MEDTRONIC PLC	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — SEC litigated determination, 2023-11-30	EG	5	1	▸

BECTON DICKINSON & CO	Elevated	EPA consent determination, severity 56, 2025-08-15 · 3 in window	E	3	2	▸

BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING INC	Elevated	SEC consent determination, severity 45, 2021-09-28	G	1		▸

DANAHER CORP	Elevated	EPA consent determination, severity 57, 2023-05-22 · 3 in window	E	3	2	▸

ECO SCIENCE SOLUTIONS INC	Elevated	SEC consent determination, severity 45, 2022-10-06	G	1		▸

Showing 5 of 124 companies. Scroll down to unlock the full report and see them all, with the determination and source behind each.

Every figure in this row is a share of these companies. There is no score here and no controversy index: a cell is a proportion of a named population, and this is that population.

Industrial Engineering

114

4%4 companies

21%24 companies

56%64 companies

0%none

18%20 companies

9%10 companies

4%4 companies

14%16 companies

▸

Companies in this cell (114)

Company	Band	Why — the rule that fired	Pillars	Determinations	Positive evidence
DEERE & CO	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2022-09-29	ESG	4	2	▸

KAP AG	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2022-09-29	E	1		▸

MANITOWOC CO	Adverse	EPA consent determination, severity 69, 2025-04-25	E	2		▸

MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS INC	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2022-09-29	E	1		▸

BAKER HUGHES CO	Elevated	MSHA final uncontested determination, severity 41, 2025-10-15 · 3 in window	S	3	2	▸

Showing 5 of 114 companies. Scroll down to unlock the full report and see them all, with the determination and source behind each.

Every figure in this row is a share of these companies. There is no score here and no controversy index: a cell is a proportion of a named population, and this is that population.

Utilities

113

4%4 companies

19%22 companies

47%53 companies

0%none

18%20 companies

8%9 companies

4%5 companies

14%16 companies

▸

Companies in this cell (113)

Company	Band	Why — the rule that fired	Pillars	Determinations	Positive evidence
ENBRIDGE INC	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2023-05-04	E	2	1	▸

NISOURCE INC	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2021-10-08	E	1	1	▸

REPUBLIC SERVICES INC	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2023-09-19	E	6	1	▸

WASTE MANAGEMENT INC	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2022-04-20	ESG	19	1	▸

AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER CO	Elevated	EPA consent determination, severity 54, 2024-08-01 · 4 in window	ESG	4		▸

Showing 5 of 113 companies. Scroll down to unlock the full report and see them all, with the determination and source behind each.

Every figure in this row is a share of these companies. There is no score here and no controversy index: a cell is a proportion of a named population, and this is that population.

Mining

111

0%none

39%43 companies

40%44 companies

0%none

4%4 companies

37%41 companies

2%2 companies

34%38 companies

▸

Companies in this cell (111)

Company	Band	Why — the rule that fired	Pillars	Determinations
ALLIANCE RESOURCE PTNRS -LP	Elevated	MSHA consent determination, severity 63, 2025-11-21 · 170 in window	S	170	▸

ALPHA METALLURGICAL RESOURCE	Elevated	MSHA consent determination, severity 65, 2023-04-10 · 324 in window	S	324	▸

AMERICAN RESOURCES CORP	Elevated	MSHA consent determination, severity 60, 2024-03-07 · 16 in window	S	16	▸

ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI PLC	Elevated	MSHA final uncontested determination, severity 35, 2026-02-25	S	1	▸

AURA MINERALS INC	Elevated	MSHA consent determination, severity 55, 2021-12-02 · 4 in window	S	4	▸

Showing 5 of 111 companies. Scroll down to unlock the full report and see them all, with the determination and source behind each.

Every figure in this row is a share of these companies. There is no score here and no controversy index: a cell is a proportion of a named population, and this is that population.

Chemicals

108

9%10 companies

44%47 companies

23%25 companies

0%none

45%49 companies

17%18 companies

5%5 companies

31%34 companies

▸

Companies in this cell (108)

Company	Band	Why — the rule that fired	Pillars	Determinations	Positive evidence
3M CO	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2022-09-29	ESG	19	2	▸

CELANESE CORP	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2022-04-14	E	4	2	▸

DOW INC	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2022-09-29	E	20	2	▸

EASTMAN CHEMICAL CO	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2023-07-28	E	6	1	▸

HF SINCLAIR CORP	Adverse	EPA consent determination, severity 69, 2025-05-27	E	5	1	▸

Showing 5 of 108 companies. Scroll down to unlock the full report and see them all, with the determination and source behind each.

Every figure in this row is a share of these companies. There is no score here and no controversy index: a cell is a proportion of a named population, and this is that population.

Food and Beverage

108

4%4 companies

23%25 companies

38%41 companies

0%none

18%19 companies

4%4 companies

9%10 companies

23%25 companies

▸

Companies in this cell (108)

Company	Band	Why — the rule that fired	Pillars	Determinations	Positive evidence
COLGATE-PALMOLIVE CO	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2022-09-29	E	7	2	▸

LVMH MOET HENNESSY LOUIS V	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — DGCOMP litigated determination, 2025-10-14	G	1	2	▸

MARIE BRIZARD WINE AND SPIRITS	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — ADLC litigated determination, 2022-04-12	G	1		▸

MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL INC	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — DGCOMP litigated determination, 2024-05-22	G	1	1	▸

ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND CO	Elevated	FCA consent determination, severity 57, 2023-10-02 · 3 in window	EG	3	3	▸

Showing 5 of 108 companies. Scroll down to unlock the full report and see them all, with the determination and source behind each.

Every figure in this row is a share of these companies. There is no score here and no controversy index: a cell is a proportion of a named population, and this is that population.

Electronic and Electrical Equipment

101

3%3 companies

12%12 companies

50%50 companies

0%none

10%10 companies

5%5 companies

3%3 companies

14%14 companies

▸

Companies in this cell (101)

Company	Band	Why — the rule that fired	Pillars	Determinations	Positive evidence
ABB LTD	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — DOJ determination, 2022-06-30	ESG	7	2	▸

MOBOTIX AG	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — ADLC litigated determination, 2021-11-08	G	1		▸

TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2022-09-29	E	3	1	▸

AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES INC	Elevated	EPA consent determination, severity 55, 2026-05-21 · 2 in window	E	2	2	▸

AMETEK INC	Elevated	MSHA final uncontested determination, severity 35, 2025-04-25	S	1		▸

Showing 5 of 101 companies. Scroll down to unlock the full report and see them all, with the determination and source behind each.

Every figure in this row is a share of these companies. There is no score here and no controversy index: a cell is a proportion of a named population, and this is that population.

Technology Hardware and Equipment

2%2 companies

8%8 companies

55%53 companies

0%none

7%7 companies

0%none

3%3 companies

19%18 companies

▸

Companies in this cell (97)

Company	Band	Why — the rule that fired	Pillars	Determinations	Positive evidence
APPLE INC	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — DGCOMP litigated determination, 2024-03-03	G	1	2	▸

MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2022-09-29	E	1		▸

CANTALOUPE INC	Elevated	SEC consent determination, severity 45, 2023-06-05	G	1		▸

GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL CO	Elevated	EPA consent determination, severity 50, 2026-05-22	E	1		▸

HP INC	Elevated	EPA consent determination, severity 58, 2023-12-01 · 2 in window	E	2	3	▸

Showing 5 of 97 companies. Scroll down to unlock the full report and see them all, with the determination and source behind each.

Every figure in this row is a share of these companies. There is no score here and no controversy index: a cell is a proportion of a named population, and this is that population.

Industrial Transportation

0%none

22%16 companies

44%32 companies

0%none

19%14 companies

3%2 companies

12%9 companies

▸

Companies in this cell (73)

Company	Band	Why — the rule that fired	Pillars	Determinations	Positive evidence
ARCBEST CORP	Elevated	EPA consent determination, severity 65, 2023-09-14 · 6 in window	E	6	1	▸

EMPIRE DIVERSIFIED ENERGY	Elevated	MSHA final uncontested determination, severity 35, 2025-10-19	S	1		▸

FEDEX CORP	Elevated	EPA consent determination, severity 56, 2021-09-28	E	1	1	▸

FRONTLINE PLC	Elevated	EPA consent determination, severity 50, 2024-05-30	E	1		▸

JANEL CORP	Elevated	EPA consent determination, severity 54, 2023-01-19 · 2 in window	E	2		▸

Showing 5 of 73 companies. Scroll down to unlock the full report and see them all, with the determination and source behind each.

Every figure in this row is a share of these companies. There is no score here and no controversy index: a cell is a proportion of a named population, and this is that population.

Travel and Leisure

0%none

10%6 companies

48%29 companies

0%none

8%5 companies

0%none

2%1 company

16%10 companies

▸

Companies in this cell (61)

Company	Band	Why — the rule that fired	Pillars	Determinations	Positive evidence
CUISINE SOLUTIONS INC	Elevated	EPA consent determination, severity 51, 2024-09-13	E	1		▸

JACK IN THE BOX INC	Elevated	EPA consent determination, severity 50, 2024-08-09	E	1		▸

MARRIOTT INTL INC	Elevated	EPA consent determination, severity 62, 2026-07-06 · 2 in window	E	2	2	▸

MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL	Elevated	EPA consent determination, severity 55, 2022-11-18	E	1	1	▸

NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINE HLDGS	Elevated	EPA consent determination, severity 61, 2026-04-10	E	1		▸

Showing 5 of 61 companies. Scroll down to unlock the full report and see them all, with the determination and source behind each.

Every figure in this row is a share of these companies. There is no score here and no controversy index: a cell is a proportion of a named population, and this is that population.

Aerospace and Defense

9%5 companies

23%12 companies

47%25 companies

0%none

26%14 companies

9%5 companies

11%6 companies

21%11 companies

▸

Companies in this cell (53)

Company	Band	Why — the rule that fired	Pillars	Determinations	Positive evidence
EATON CORP PLC	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2022-09-29	ES	7	1	▸

GE AEROSPACE	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2022-09-29	E	10	2	▸

GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2022-09-29	ES	5		▸

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2024-09-04	ESG	18	2	▸

TEXTRON INC	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2022-09-29	ES	12		▸

Showing 5 of 53 companies. Scroll down to unlock the full report and see them all, with the determination and source behind each.

Every figure in this row is a share of these companies. There is no score here and no controversy index: a cell is a proportion of a named population, and this is that population.

General Industrials

6%3 companies

26%14 companies

32%17 companies

0%none

30%16 companies

0%none

4%2 companies

15%8 companies

▸

Companies in this cell (53)

Company	Band	Why — the rule that fired	Pillars	Determinations	Positive evidence
CROWN HOLDINGS INC	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — DGCOMP determination, 2022-07-11	EG	2	2	▸

ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2022-09-29	E	1	1	▸

SILGAN HOLDINGS INC	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — DGCOMP determination, 2022-07-11	G	1	1	▸

AVANTOR INC	Elevated	EPA consent determination, severity 63, 2021-12-15 · 5 in window	E	5	2	▸

AVERY DENNISON CORP	Elevated	EPA consent determination, severity 50, 2023-12-05	E	1	2	▸

Showing 5 of 53 companies. Scroll down to unlock the full report and see them all, with the determination and source behind each.

Every figure in this row is a share of these companies. There is no score here and no controversy index: a cell is a proportion of a named population, and this is that population.

Automobiles and Parts

17%9 companies

33%17 companies

0%none

21%11 companies

0%none

17%9 companies

21%11 companies

▸

Companies in this cell (52)

Company	Band	Why — the rule that fired	Pillars	Determinations	Positive evidence
BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AKT	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — DGCOMP determination, 2025-04-01	G	1	4	▸

DANA INC	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2022-09-29	E	2	2	▸

FORD MOTOR CO	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — DGCOMP determination, 2025-04-01	EG	5	3	▸

GENERAL MOTORS CO	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — DGCOMP determination, 2025-04-01	EG	5	2	▸

HARLEY-DAVIDSON INC	Adverse	EPA consent determination, severity 69, 2024-11-08	E	1		▸

Showing 5 of 52 companies. Scroll down to unlock the full report and see them all, with the determination and source behind each.

Every figure in this row is a share of these companies. There is no score here and no controversy index: a cell is a proportion of a named population, and this is that population.

Insurance

6%3 companies

4%2 companies

38%18 companies

0%none

6%3 companies

4%2 companies

2%1 company

38%18 companies

▸

Companies in this cell (48)

Company	Band	Why — the rule that fired	Pillars	Determinations	Positive evidence
CNA FINANCIAL CORP	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2022-09-29	E	1	1	▸

HARTFORD INSURANCE GROUP INC	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2022-09-29	ES	7	1	▸

MARKEL GROUP INC	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2022-09-29	E	1	1	▸

OLD REPUBLIC INTL CORP	Elevated	MSHA final uncontested determination, severity 35, 2022-11-03 · 4 in window	S	4		▸

WHITE MTNS INS GROUP LTD	Elevated	SEC consent determination, severity 45, 2024-12-13	G	1		▸

Showing 5 of 48 companies. Scroll down to unlock the full report and see them all, with the determination and source behind each.

Every figure in this row is a share of these companies. There is no score here and no controversy index: a cell is a proportion of a named population, and this is that population.

Media

4%2 companies

13%6 companies

50%23 companies

0%none

9%4 companies

2%1 company

11%5 companies

▸

Companies in this cell (46)

Company	Band	Why — the rule that fired	Pillars	Determinations	Positive evidence
COMCAST CORP	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — AGCM litigated determination, 2023-06-28	ESG	7	4	▸

MORNINGSTAR INC	Adverse	on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2023-09-29	G	4	1	▸

CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR HLDGS	Elevated	SEC consent determination, severity 55, 2023-09-28	G	1		▸

DISNEY (WALT) CO	Elevated	EPA consent determination, severity 58, 2024-07-12 · 2 in window	E	2	1	▸

GRAHAM HOLDINGS CO	Elevated	SEC consent determination, severity 45, 2022-01-07	G	1	1	▸

Showing 5 of 46 companies. Scroll down to unlock the full report and see them all, with the determination and source behind each.

Every figure in this row is a share of these companies. There is no score here and no controversy index: a cell is a proportion of a named population, and this is that population.

Industrial Metals

0%none

30%12 companies

0%none

15%6 companies

20%8 companies

0%none

22%9 companies

▸

Companies in this cell (40)

Company	Band	Why — the rule that fired	Pillars	Determinations
ALCOA CORP	Elevated	EPA consent determination, severity 58, 2021-11-10 · 5 in window	ES	5	▸

AZZ INC	Elevated	EPA consent determination, severity 59, 2025-10-28	E	1	▸

CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP	Elevated	EPA consent determination, severity 56, 2025-06-20 · 2 in window	E	2	▸

CENTURY ALUMINUM CO	Elevated	EPA consent determination, severity 57, 2022-04-27	E	1	▸

CLEVELAND-CLIFFS INC	Elevated	MSHA consent determination, severity 63, 2023-11-16 · 145 in window	ES	145	▸

Showing 5 of 40 companies. Scroll down to unlock the full report and see them all, with the determination and source behind each.

Every figure in this row is a share of these companies. There is no score here and no controversy index: a cell is a proportion of a named population, and this is that population.

Showing 25 of 429 sectors. Scroll down to unlock the full report and see them all, with the determination and source behind each.

6 of 33 rows fall below the 20-company floor and carry no colour. That floor is provisional — config.HEATMAP_MIN_CELL_COMPANIES, dated and recorded, to be measured rather than tuned.

404 more sectors in this report

Enter a work email for the full report on data as at 30 June 2026: every sector with the determination behind it, the regulator, the date and a link to the source record.

Move to live data

The profile above is published on a quarter-delayed cut. Clients receive it on current data, filterable to one country, with the population behind every cell.

Published

Quarter-delayed reports

Open to everyone. Full methodology, data sources and band rules, on data as at the end of the last quarter.

Subscription

Client subscription

Current data rather than last quarter's, the complete universe, full history, alerts, CSV and API. Priced per firm.

Client account

Your own portfolio

Upload holdings and keep them. Saved screens, exclusion policies and monitoring that persist between sessions.

See this report on today’s data, against your own book.

Clients receive the same report on current data across the complete universe, with the evidence behind every band. Higher-frequency updates and bespoke reporting are available on request.

Request a briefing → hello@sustainesg.io