Pension fund evidence report
Royal London Governed Range
Holdings as at 2025-08-31 · evidence snapshot 2026-09-01 · the company record of every holding; the scheme publishes no scheme-wide exclusion of this kind.

The company’s record, for every holding

This scheme publishes no scheme-wide UN Global Compact exclusion — no UNGC rule. There is no scheme rule on this page for a holding to engage, and the page does not test one.

The company’s record. 248 of 1,093 holdings — 26.7% of the extracted holdings — carry a final adjudicated determination inside the five-year window. Each row shows the company’s band and the one determination that set it. That part of the row is the same on every report we publish, whichever scheme holds the company. 65 of them are on our exclusion bar.

These are Sustain Labs measures of the holdings, the two figures the comparison table sets beside every other scheme’s. They do not depend on the scheme having a rule, and they are not a statement that the scheme breaches one.

221 holdings carry a review marker. Each is fired by one stated rule, printed on the row and in full when the row is opened. A marker is a prompt to look at the record, not a recommendation.

1,093 of 2,611holdings tested — 74.8% of the extracted holdings
248carry a final adverse determination of any kind — 26.7% of the extracted holdings
—no scheme-wide exclusion to engage — no UNGC rule
221marked for review, each by the rule printed on its row
65excluded on Sustain Labs: on our exclusion bar
What these percentages are over. Percentages on this page are over the extracted holdings — mv_gbp000 totalling 27,879,655. It is A market value in GBP thousands across three confirmed funds. The scheme-level look-through, 53.0% of managed assets, is a separate figure and is not this column.
The scheme’s other commitments
What else it promised, and whether it can be tested
The commitments report examines every published commitment across both layers, the share of the equity allocation each binds, and the parts of the arrangement whose documents were not retrievable.
Analyse commitments and compare against peers →
Is it moving?
The holdings’ emissions against their own promises, on registry and satellite evidence
9 holdings (2.2% of the scheme) are behind their own promise or have witnesses that disagree; 2 are ahead (0.0%). 100% of the scheme by weight has no Pace verdict the evidence can support. Words with evidence, never a score; nothing here moves a band.
Transition evidence →
The 248 holdings
Each company’s record
Band, regulator, stage, severity and date are the company’s record and are the same on every report. Scheme’s exclusion reads no scheme-wide rule on every row: no UNGC rule. Click any row for every determination behind it.
HoldingWeightUnderlying fundSustain Labs bandRegulatorStageSevDeterminedDaysnScheme’s exclusionReviewScope 1+2Scope 3Intensity
▸ NM SHELL PLC News monitored: 48 mentions2.14%—EXCLUDED · CONDUCTEPAlitigated822023-11-096616NO SCHEME-WIDE RULEREVIEW
Excluded on Sustain Labs but not by scheme
58,000,0002024491,000,000204
Reported carbon
Scope 1 + 2
58,000,000 tCO₂e
Intensity
204.0 tCO₂e / $m revenue
Scope 1
50,000,000 tCO₂e
Scope 2 · location-based
8,000,000 tCO₂e
Scope 3
491,000,000 tCO₂e
Reporting year
2024
Disclosure level
Full
Assurance
no assurance statement
no assurance statement — WBA publishes none for any company, so this is the absence of a statement, not a failed audit
Emissions are carried beside the bands and never inside them. Nothing on this panel moved the band above.
Flags — shown, never scored
A sanctions flag means the company appears on that list, matched by identifier; news mentions are monitored coverage from GDELT. Neither changes the band or can exclude a company.
Adverse — adjudicated determinations, five-year window to 2026-09-01
E · EnvironmentEPA · litigated · severity 82 · 2023-11-09sets the band
E · EnvironmentEPA · consent · severity 66 · 2026-05-01
E · EnvironmentEPA · consent · severity 58 · 2023-11-09
E · EnvironmentEPA · consent · severity 50 · 2025-04-01
E · EnvironmentEPA · consent · severity 50 · 2026-08-19
E · EnvironmentEPA · consent · severity 50 · 2024-06-10
Positive — registry and self-reported
ets verified falling · 2025-12-31 · registry
Verified emissions · EU ETS · operator-filed, accredited verifier, competent authority — attributed verified tonnage of 3 hand-mapped account holders (the top of the 2025 EU ranking, not the group's whole EU book): 2021 10.22 Mt, 2022 10.05 Mt, 2023 9.65 Mt, 2024 9.42 Mt, 2025 8.74 Mt; -3.8% a year 2021-2025, falling.
The EU Transaction Log publishes verified emissions per installation, not per company; the account holders mapped to this company and the verified years are the citation, and the data package is the lookup. Verified emissions, not a determination. The reference is 012384:eu_ets:2021-2025.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21414185
sbti validated target · 2024-02-22 · registry
1.5°C · net zero: Targets set · long term: Targets set
SBTi publishes no per-company page; the target dashboard is a search over the free export. The SBTi target-dashboard company id is 40007307.
https://sciencebasedtargets.org/companies-taking-action
climate trace fleet falling · 2025-12-31 · registry
Independent estimate · not adjudicated · Climate TRACE — currently controlled fleet (electricity-generation, 8 facilities): 2021 1.63 Mt, 2022 2.15 Mt, 2023 1.59 Mt, 2024 1.62 Mt, 2025 1.27 Mt; -6.1% a year 2021-2025, falling.
Climate TRACE publishes its inventory as a bulk package, not a page per company; the fleet the company controls today and the years of its series are the citation, and the direction is an independent estimate, not a determination. The reference is 012384:climate_trace_fleet:2021-2025.
https://climatetrace.org/data
The band above is a lookup on published rules, each fired by one stated fact — never a weighted average of these two columns. The rule that fired is stated here: on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2023-11-09.
Why this band. on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2023-11-09
This scheme’s exclusion. No scheme-wide rule: no UNGC rule. The record is the company's; there is no scheme exclusion for it to engage.
Why review. Litigated EPA ruling (2023) meets our exclusion bar. The scheme publishes no scheme-wide UN Global Compact exclusion to reach it.
Determined 661 days before the holdings date. 6 final determinations inside the window.
▸ NM HSBC HLDGS PLC1.99%—EXCLUDED · CONDUCTDG COMPlitigated842021-12-021,3683NO SCHEME-WIDE RULEREVIEW
Excluded on Sustain Labs but not by scheme
98,785202439,159,577 estnot computable
Reported carbon
Scope 1 + 2
98,785 tCO₂e
Intensity
no intensity — revenue is not reported for this company
Scope 1
15,025 tCO₂e
Scope 2 · location-based
282,601 tCO₂e
Scope 3 (estimated)
39,159,577 tCO₂e
Reporting year
—
Disclosure level
Full
Assurance
no assurance statement
Scope 2 here is the location-based figure from WBA's climate profile. The reported Scope 1+2 above it uses a market-based Scope 2, so the two do not add up and are not meant to: they are different accounting bases, not a discrepancy. WBA labels neither, so this is read from the arithmetic — the profile's Scope 1 agrees with the aggregate on every company, and the residual differs only where the company buys renewable instruments.
no assurance statement — WBA publishes none for any company, so this is the absence of a statement, not a failed audit
Emissions are carried beside the bands and never inside them. Nothing on this panel moved the band above.
Adverse — adjudicated determinations, five-year window to 2026-09-01
G · GovernanceDGCOMP · litigated · severity 84 · 2021-12-02sets the band
G · GovernanceFCA · consent · severity 57 · 2021-12-17
G · GovernanceCMA · litigated · severity 86 · 2025-07-16 · final presumed · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
Positive — registry and self-reported
modern slavery statement · 2026-01-20 · reported_unassured
The band above is a lookup on published rules, each fired by one stated fact — never a weighted average of these two columns. The rule that fired is stated here: on the exclusion bar — DGCOMP litigated determination, 2021-12-02.
Why this band. on the exclusion bar — DGCOMP litigated determination, 2021-12-02
This scheme’s exclusion. No scheme-wide rule: no UNGC rule. The record is the company's; there is no scheme exclusion for it to engage.
Why review. Litigated DG COMP ruling (2021) meets our exclusion bar. The scheme publishes no scheme-wide UN Global Compact exclusion to reach it.
Determined 1,368 days before the holdings date. 3 final determinations inside the window.
▸ NM APPLE INC News monitored: 3 mentions1.30%—EXCLUDED · CONDUCTDG COMPlitigated842024-03-045452NO SCHEME-WIDE RULEREVIEW
Excluded on Sustain Labs but not by scheme
58,500202415,110,0000
Reported carbon
Scope 1 + 2
58,500 tCO₂e
Intensity
0.1 tCO₂e / $m revenue
Scope 1
55,200 tCO₂e
Scope 2 · location-based
1,224,500 tCO₂e
Scope 3
15,110,000 tCO₂e
Reporting year
2024
Disclosure level
Full
Assurance
no assurance statement
Scope 2 here is the location-based figure from WBA's climate profile. The reported Scope 1+2 above it uses a market-based Scope 2, so the two do not add up and are not meant to: they are different accounting bases, not a discrepancy. WBA labels neither, so this is read from the arithmetic — the profile's Scope 1 agrees with the aggregate on every company, and the residual differs only where the company buys renewable instruments.
no assurance statement — WBA publishes none for any company, so this is the absence of a statement, not a failed audit
Emissions are carried beside the bands and never inside them. Nothing on this panel moved the band above.
Flags — shown, never scored
A sanctions flag means the company appears on that list, matched by identifier; news mentions are monitored coverage from GDELT. Neither changes the band or can exclude a company.
Adverse — adjudicated determinations, five-year window to 2026-09-01
G · GovernanceDGCOMP · litigated · severity 84 · 2024-03-04sets the band
E · EnvironmentEPA · consent · severity 61 · 2026-01-28
G · GovernanceAGCM · litigated · severity 87 · 2021-11-16 · final presumed · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
G · GovernanceAGCM · litigated · severity 87 · 2025-12-16 · final presumed · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
G · GovernanceAGCM · litigated · severity 85 · 2021-11-09 · final presumed · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
G · GovernanceADLC · litigated · severity 84 · 2025-03-31 · under appeal · under appeal — cannot exclude
Positive — registry and self-reported
sbti validated target · 2021-05-06 · registry
1.5°C
SBTi publishes no per-company page; the target dashboard is a search over the free export. The SBTi target-dashboard company id is 40003329.
https://sciencebasedtargets.org/companies-taking-action
modern slavery statement · 2025-05-28 · reported_unassured
The band above is a lookup on published rules, each fired by one stated fact — never a weighted average of these two columns. The rule that fired is stated here: on the exclusion bar — DGCOMP litigated determination, 2024-03-04.
Why this band. on the exclusion bar — DGCOMP litigated determination, 2024-03-04
This scheme’s exclusion. No scheme-wide rule: no UNGC rule. The record is the company's; there is no scheme exclusion for it to engage.
Why review. Litigated DG COMP ruling (2024) meets our exclusion bar. The scheme publishes no scheme-wide UN Global Compact exclusion to reach it.
Determined 545 days before the holdings date. 2 final determinations inside the window.
▸ NM ALPHABET INC News monitored: 1060 mentions1.17%—EXCLUDED · CONDUCTDG COMPlitigated842025-09-05after holdings date3NO SCHEME-WIDE RULEREVIEW
Excluded on Sustain Labs but not by scheme
3,132,200202412,053,0009
Reported carbon
Scope 1 + 2
3,132,200 tCO₂e
Intensity
8.9 tCO₂e / $m revenue
Scope 1
73,100 tCO₂e
Scope 2 · location-based
11,283,200 tCO₂e
Scope 3
12,053,000 tCO₂e
Reporting year
2024
Disclosure level
Relevant
Assurance
no assurance statement
Scope 2 here is the location-based figure from WBA's climate profile. The reported Scope 1+2 above it uses a market-based Scope 2, so the two do not add up and are not meant to: they are different accounting bases, not a discrepancy. WBA labels neither, so this is read from the arithmetic — the profile's Scope 1 agrees with the aggregate on every company, and the residual differs only where the company buys renewable instruments.
no assurance statement — WBA publishes none for any company, so this is the absence of a statement, not a failed audit
Emissions are carried beside the bands and never inside them. Nothing on this panel moved the band above.
Flags — shown, never scored
A sanctions flag means the company appears on that list, matched by identifier; news mentions are monitored coverage from GDELT. Neither changes the band or can exclude a company.
Adverse — adjudicated determinations, five-year window to 2026-09-01
G · GovernanceDGCOMP · litigated · severity 84 · 2025-09-05sets the band
G · GovernanceSEC · consent · severity 45 · 2024-09-25
G · GovernanceCNIL · litigated · severity 87 · 2025-09-03 · final presumed · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
G · GovernanceAGCM · litigated · severity 85 · 2021-11-16 · final presumed · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
G · GovernanceAGCM · litigated · severity 84 · 2025-03-04 · final presumed · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
G · GovernanceEDPB · final uncontested · severity 42 · 2023-06-30 · final presumed · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
Positive — registry and self-reported
sbti validated target · 2025-07-03 · registry
1.5°C
SBTi publishes no per-company page; the target dashboard is a search over the free export. The SBTi target-dashboard company id is 40009770.
https://sciencebasedtargets.org/companies-taking-action
modern slavery statement · 2026-05-19 · reported_unassured
The band above is a lookup on published rules, each fired by one stated fact — never a weighted average of these two columns. The rule that fired is stated here: on the exclusion bar — DGCOMP litigated determination, 2025-09-05.
Why this band. on the exclusion bar — DGCOMP litigated determination, 2025-09-05
This scheme’s exclusion. No scheme-wide rule: no UNGC rule. The record is the company's; there is no scheme exclusion for it to engage.
Why review. Litigated DG COMP ruling (2025) meets our exclusion bar. The scheme publishes no scheme-wide UN Global Compact exclusion to reach it.
The determination that set the band is dated 5 days after the holdings date. 3 final determinations inside the window.
▸ NM BARCLAYS PLC News monitored: 31 mentions0.63%—EXCLUDED · CONDUCTSECdetermination922022-09-271,0697NO SCHEME-WIDE RULEREVIEW
Excluded on Sustain Labs but not by scheme
93,7892024not reportednot computable
Reported carbon
Scope 1 + 2
93,789 tCO₂e
Intensity
no intensity — revenue is not reported for this company
Scope 1
8,949 tCO₂e
Scope 2 · location-based
84,839 tCO₂e
Scope 3
not reported tCO₂e
Reporting year
—
Disclosure level
Relevant
Assurance
no assurance statement
no assurance statement — WBA publishes none for any company, so this is the absence of a statement, not a failed audit
Emissions are carried beside the bands and never inside them. Nothing on this panel moved the band above.
Flags — shown, never scored
A sanctions flag means the company appears on that list, matched by identifier; news mentions are monitored coverage from GDELT. Neither changes the band or can exclude a company.
Adverse — adjudicated determinations, five-year window to 2026-09-01
G · GovernanceSEC · determination · severity 92 · 2022-09-27sets the band
G · GovernanceDGCOMP · litigated · severity 84 · 2021-12-02
G · GovernanceFCA · consent · severity 57 · 2022-02-28
G · GovernanceFCA · consent · severity 57 · 2024-11-25
G · GovernanceFCA · consent · severity 57 · 2024-11-25
G · GovernanceFCA · consent · severity 57 · 2025-07-14
1 further determinations in the window, not shown
Positive — registry and self-reported
modern slavery statement · 2026-02-09 · reported_unassured
The band above is a lookup on published rules, each fired by one stated fact — never a weighted average of these two columns. The rule that fired is stated here: on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2022-09-27.
Why this band. on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2022-09-27
This scheme’s exclusion. No scheme-wide rule: no UNGC rule. The record is the company's; there is no scheme exclusion for it to engage.
Why review. Determination SEC ruling (2022) meets our exclusion bar. The scheme publishes no scheme-wide UN Global Compact exclusion to reach it.
Determined 1,069 days before the holdings date. 7 final determinations inside the window.
▸ NM NATWEST GROUP PLC News monitored: 2 mentions0.50%—EXCLUDED · CONDUCTDG COMPlitigated842021-12-021,3681NO SCHEME-WIDE RULEREVIEW
Excluded on Sustain Labs but not by scheme
56,286202417,700,000not computable
Reported carbon
Scope 1 + 2
56,286 tCO₂e
Intensity
no intensity — revenue is not reported for this company
Scope 1
9,402 tCO₂e
Scope 2 · location-based
46,884 tCO₂e
Scope 3
17,700,000 tCO₂e
Reporting year
—
Disclosure level
Full
Assurance
no assurance statement
no assurance statement — WBA publishes none for any company, so this is the absence of a statement, not a failed audit
Emissions are carried beside the bands and never inside them. Nothing on this panel moved the band above.
Flags — shown, never scored
A sanctions flag means the company appears on that list, matched by identifier; news mentions are monitored coverage from GDELT. Neither changes the band or can exclude a company.
Adverse — adjudicated determinations, five-year window to 2026-09-01
G · GovernanceDGCOMP · litigated · severity 84 · 2021-12-02sets the band
Positive — registry and self-reported
modern slavery statement · 2026-06-11 · reported_unassured
ungc participant · 2003-10-10 · reported_unassured
The band above is a lookup on published rules, each fired by one stated fact — never a weighted average of these two columns. The rule that fired is stated here: on the exclusion bar — DGCOMP litigated determination, 2021-12-02.
Why this band. on the exclusion bar — DGCOMP litigated determination, 2021-12-02
This scheme’s exclusion. No scheme-wide rule: no UNGC rule. The record is the company's; there is no scheme exclusion for it to engage.
Why review. Litigated DG COMP ruling (2021) meets our exclusion bar. The scheme publishes no scheme-wide UN Global Compact exclusion to reach it.
Determined 1,368 days before the holdings date. 1 final determination inside the window.
▸ NM GLENCORE PLC News monitored: 12 mentions0.42%—EXCLUDED · CONDUCTDOJdetermination992022-06-301,1581NO SCHEME-WIDE RULEREVIEW
Excluded on Sustain Labs but not by scheme
26,579,0002024389,318,000115
Reported carbon
Scope 1 + 2
26,579,000 tCO₂e
Intensity
115.1 tCO₂e / $m revenue
Scope 1
16,177,000 tCO₂e
Scope 2 · location-based
10,881,000 tCO₂e
Scope 3
389,318,000 tCO₂e
Reporting year
2024
Disclosure level
Full
Assurance
no assurance statement
Scope 2 here is the location-based figure from WBA's climate profile. The reported Scope 1+2 above it uses a market-based Scope 2, so the two do not add up and are not meant to: they are different accounting bases, not a discrepancy. WBA labels neither, so this is read from the arithmetic — the profile's Scope 1 agrees with the aggregate on every company, and the residual differs only where the company buys renewable instruments.
no assurance statement — WBA publishes none for any company, so this is the absence of a statement, not a failed audit
Emissions are carried beside the bands and never inside them. Nothing on this panel moved the band above.
Flags — shown, never scored
A sanctions flag means the company appears on that list, matched by identifier; news mentions are monitored coverage from GDELT. Neither changes the band or can exclude a company.
Adverse — adjudicated determinations, five-year window to 2026-09-01
G · GovernanceDOJ · determination · severity 99 · 2022-06-30sets the band
G · GovernanceDOJ · determination · severity 100 · 2022-05-24 · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
G · GovernanceDOJ · determination · severity 98 · 2022-05-24 · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
Positive — registry and self-reported
modern slavery statement · 2026-05-29 · reported_unassured
ungc participant · 2014-06-30 · reported_unassured
The band above is a lookup on published rules, each fired by one stated fact — never a weighted average of these two columns. The rule that fired is stated here: on the exclusion bar — DOJ determination, 2022-06-30.
Why this band. on the exclusion bar — DOJ determination, 2022-06-30
This scheme’s exclusion. No scheme-wide rule: no UNGC rule. The record is the company's; there is no scheme exclusion for it to engage.
Why review. Determination DOJ ruling (2022) meets our exclusion bar. The scheme publishes no scheme-wide UN Global Compact exclusion to reach it.
Determined 1,158 days before the holdings date. 1 final determination inside the window.
▸ NM ESSILORLUXOTTICA SOCIETE0.32%—EXCLUDED · CONDUCTADLClitigated842022-10-061,0601NO SCHEME-WIDE RULEREVIEW
Excluded on Sustain Labs but not by scheme
not heldnot heldnot held
Reported carbon
This company does not appear in the WBA climate download, so we hold no reported emissions figure for it. That is an absence of disclosure we can see, not a low number.
Adverse — adjudicated determinations, five-year window to 2026-09-01
G · GovernanceADLC · litigated · severity 84 · 2022-10-06sets the band
Positive — registry and self-reported
sbti validated target · 2024-12-12 · registry
1.5°C
SBTi publishes no per-company page; the target dashboard is a search over the free export. The SBTi target-dashboard company id is 40005948.
https://sciencebasedtargets.org/companies-taking-action
The band above is a lookup on published rules, each fired by one stated fact — never a weighted average of these two columns. The rule that fired is stated here: on the exclusion bar — ADLC litigated determination, 2022-10-06.
Why this band. on the exclusion bar — ADLC litigated determination, 2022-10-06
This scheme’s exclusion. No scheme-wide rule: no UNGC rule. The record is the company's; there is no scheme exclusion for it to engage.
Why review. Litigated ADLC ruling (2022) meets our exclusion bar. The scheme publishes no scheme-wide UN Global Compact exclusion to reach it.
Determined 1,060 days before the holdings date. 1 final determination inside the window.
▸ NM PROCTER & GAMBLE CO News monitored: 14 mentions0.19%—EXCLUDED · CONDUCTEPAlitigated822022-09-291,0674NO SCHEME-WIDE RULEREVIEW
Excluded on Sustain Labs but not by scheme
2,152,0002024168,127,82326
Reported carbon
Scope 1 + 2
2,152,000 tCO₂e
Intensity
25.6 tCO₂e / $m revenue
Scope 1
1,987,000 tCO₂e
Scope 2 · location-based
2,228,000 tCO₂e
Scope 3
168,127,823 tCO₂e
Reporting year
2024
Disclosure level
Relevant
Assurance
no assurance statement
Scope 2 here is the location-based figure from WBA's climate profile. The reported Scope 1+2 above it uses a market-based Scope 2, so the two do not add up and are not meant to: they are different accounting bases, not a discrepancy. WBA labels neither, so this is read from the arithmetic — the profile's Scope 1 agrees with the aggregate on every company, and the residual differs only where the company buys renewable instruments.
no assurance statement — WBA publishes none for any company, so this is the absence of a statement, not a failed audit
Emissions are carried beside the bands and never inside them. Nothing on this panel moved the band above.
Flags — shown, never scored
A sanctions flag means the company appears on that list, matched by identifier; news mentions are monitored coverage from GDELT. Neither changes the band or can exclude a company.
Adverse — adjudicated determinations, five-year window to 2026-09-01
E · EnvironmentEPA · litigated · severity 82 · 2022-09-29sets the band
E · EnvironmentEPA · consent · severity 50 · 2023-12-05
E · EnvironmentEPA · consent · severity 50 · 2023-11-27
E · EnvironmentEPA · consent · severity 50 · 2023-11-27
Positive — registry and self-reported
sbti validated target · 2023-11-09 · registry
1.5°C · net zero: Commitment removed
SBTi publishes no per-company page; the target dashboard is a search over the free export. The SBTi target-dashboard company id is 40004926.
https://sciencebasedtargets.org/companies-taking-action
climate trace fleet falling · 2025-12-31 · registry
Independent estimate · not adjudicated · Climate TRACE — currently controlled fleet (electricity-generation, 1 facilities): 2021 0.41 Mt, 2022 0.40 Mt, 2023 0.38 Mt, 2024 0.39 Mt, 2025 0.36 Mt; -3.2% a year 2021-2025, falling.
Climate TRACE publishes its inventory as a bulk package, not a page per company; the fleet the company controls today and the years of its series are the citation, and the direction is an independent estimate, not a determination. The reference is 008762:climate_trace_fleet:2021-2025.
https://climatetrace.org/data
Independent — measured or assessed by a third party, not adjudicated
E · EnvironmentIndependent estimate · not adjudicated · Climate TRACE · climate trace intensity above median · severity 36 · 2025-12-31
Independent estimate · not adjudicated · Climate TRACE — 2025 fleet of 1 controlled power facility: 361,960 tCO2e over 472,980 MWh = 0.765 tCO2e per MWh (population median 0.607, worst decile from 1.067); highest-intensity facility Oxnard (gas, 0.765).
Climate TRACE publishes its inventory as a bulk package, not a page per facility; the controlling parent's LEI and the inventory year are the citation, and the figure is an independent estimate, not a determination.
The citation is 2572IBTT8CCZW6AU4141:electricity-generation:2025.
Climate TRACE lookup →
An independent estimate informs the pillar it is about and is shown here with its source; it is not a determination and it can never exclude a company.
The band above is a lookup on published rules, each fired by one stated fact — never a weighted average of these two columns. The rule that fired is stated here: on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2022-09-29.
Why this band. on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2022-09-29
This scheme’s exclusion. No scheme-wide rule: no UNGC rule. The record is the company's; there is no scheme exclusion for it to engage.
Why review. Litigated EPA ruling (2022) meets our exclusion bar. The scheme publishes no scheme-wide UN Global Compact exclusion to reach it.
Determined 1,067 days before the holdings date. 4 final determinations inside the window.
▸ NM GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC News monitored: 56 mentions0.16%—EXCLUDED · CONDUCTSECdetermination922023-09-227093NO SCHEME-WIDE RULEREVIEW
Excluded on Sustain Labs but not by scheme
168,9472023not reportednot computable
Reported carbon
Scope 1 + 2
168,947 tCO₂e
Intensity
no intensity — revenue is not reported for this company
Scope 1
13,842 tCO₂e
Scope 2 · location-based
155,105 tCO₂e
Scope 3
not reported tCO₂e
Reporting year
—
Disclosure level
Basic
Assurance
no assurance statement
no assurance statement — WBA publishes none for any company, so this is the absence of a statement, not a failed audit
WBA records this company as owing scopes it has not published: S3.15.
Emissions are carried beside the bands and never inside them. Nothing on this panel moved the band above.
Flags — shown, never scored
A sanctions flag means the company appears on that list, matched by identifier; news mentions are monitored coverage from GDELT. Neither changes the band or can exclude a company.
Adverse — adjudicated determinations, five-year window to 2026-09-01
G · GovernanceSEC · determination · severity 92 · 2023-09-22sets the band
G · GovernanceSEC · determination · severity 92 · 2022-09-27
G · GovernanceSEC · consent · severity 45 · 2024-09-25
S · SocialCFPB · consent · severity 62 · 2024-10-23 · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
Positive — registry and self-reported
modern slavery statement · 2026-03-13 · reported_unassured
The band above is a lookup on published rules, each fired by one stated fact — never a weighted average of these two columns. The rule that fired is stated here: on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2023-09-22.
Why this band. on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2023-09-22
This scheme’s exclusion. No scheme-wide rule: no UNGC rule. The record is the company's; there is no scheme exclusion for it to engage.
Why review. Determination SEC ruling (2023) meets our exclusion bar. The scheme publishes no scheme-wide UN Global Compact exclusion to reach it.
Determined 709 days before the holdings date. 3 final determinations inside the window.
▸ NM GENERAL MOTORS CO0.12%—EXCLUDED · CONDUCTDG COMPdetermination912025-04-011525NO SCHEME-WIDE RULEREVIEW
Excluded on Sustain Labs but not by scheme
2,700,0002023240,773,79414
Reported carbon
Scope 1 + 2
2,700,000 tCO₂e
Intensity
14.4 tCO₂e / $m revenue
Scope 1
1,304,570 tCO₂e
Scope 2 · location-based
2,341,276 tCO₂e
Scope 3
240,773,794 tCO₂e
Reporting year
2023 emissions over 2024 revenue
Disclosure level
Full
Assurance
no assurance statement
Scope 2 here is the location-based figure from WBA's climate profile. The reported Scope 1+2 above it uses a market-based Scope 2, so the two do not add up and are not meant to: they are different accounting bases, not a discrepancy. WBA labels neither, so this is read from the arithmetic — the profile's Scope 1 agrees with the aggregate on every company, and the residual differs only where the company buys renewable instruments.
no assurance statement — WBA publishes none for any company, so this is the absence of a statement, not a failed audit
The intensity pairs two different years: WBA publishes revenue for 2024 only, so an earlier emissions year is divided by 2024 revenue rather than left out.
Emissions are carried beside the bands and never inside them. Nothing on this panel moved the band above.
Adverse — adjudicated determinations, five-year window to 2026-09-01
G · GovernanceDGCOMP · determination · severity 91 · 2025-04-01sets the band
E · EnvironmentEPA · litigated · severity 82 · 2023-09-19
E · EnvironmentEPA · consent · severity 58 · 2025-05-01
E · EnvironmentEPA · consent · severity 50 · 2023-11-20
E · EnvironmentEPA · consent · severity 50 · 2023-11-20
G · GovernanceCMA · litigated · severity 86 · 2025-05-16 · final presumed · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
Positive — registry and self-reported
sbti validated target · 2021-05-20 · registry
1.5°C/Well-below 2°C · net zero: Commitment removed
SBTi publishes no per-company page; the target dashboard is a search over the free export. The SBTi target-dashboard company id is 40001768.
https://sciencebasedtargets.org/companies-taking-action
ungc participant · 2015-11-06 · reported_unassured
The band above is a lookup on published rules, each fired by one stated fact — never a weighted average of these two columns. The rule that fired is stated here: on the exclusion bar — DGCOMP determination, 2025-04-01.
Why this band. on the exclusion bar — DGCOMP determination, 2025-04-01
This scheme’s exclusion. No scheme-wide rule: no UNGC rule. The record is the company's; there is no scheme exclusion for it to engage.
Why review. Determination DG COMP ruling (2025) meets our exclusion bar. The scheme publishes no scheme-wide UN Global Compact exclusion to reach it.
Determined 152 days before the holdings date. 5 final determinations inside the window.
▸ NM SOCIETE GENERALE GROUP0.08%—EXCLUDED · CONDUCTSECdetermination922023-08-087541NO SCHEME-WIDE RULEREVIEW
Excluded on Sustain Labs but not by scheme
153,7452024not reportednot computable
Reported carbon
Scope 1 + 2
153,745 tCO₂e
Intensity
no intensity — revenue is not reported for this company
Scope 1
42,867 tCO₂e
Scope 2 · location-based
110,878 tCO₂e
Scope 3
not reported tCO₂e
Reporting year
—
Disclosure level
Basic
Assurance
no assurance statement
no assurance statement — WBA publishes none for any company, so this is the absence of a statement, not a failed audit
WBA records this company as owing scopes it has not published: S3.15.
Emissions are carried beside the bands and never inside them. Nothing on this panel moved the band above.
Adverse — adjudicated determinations, five-year window to 2026-09-01
G · GovernanceSEC · determination · severity 92 · 2023-08-08sets the band
G · GovernanceAGCM · litigated · severity 85 · 2025-09-23 · final presumed · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
G · GovernanceAGCM · litigated · severity 84 · 2021-09-07 · final presumed · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
Positive — registry and self-reported
sbti validated target · 2023-09-14 · registry
1.5°C · net zero: Targets set · long term: Targets set
SBTi publishes no per-company page; the target dashboard is a search over the free export. The SBTi target-dashboard company id is 40002111.
https://sciencebasedtargets.org/companies-taking-action
modern slavery statement · 2026-06-29 · reported_unassured
ungc participant · 2003-06-09 · reported_unassured
The band above is a lookup on published rules, each fired by one stated fact — never a weighted average of these two columns. The rule that fired is stated here: on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2023-08-08.
Why this band. on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2023-08-08
This scheme’s exclusion. No scheme-wide rule: no UNGC rule. The record is the company's; there is no scheme exclusion for it to engage.
Why review. Determination SEC ruling (2023) meets our exclusion bar. The scheme publishes no scheme-wide UN Global Compact exclusion to reach it.
Determined 754 days before the holdings date. 1 final determination inside the window.
▸ NM TORONTO DOMINION BANK0.08%—EXCLUDED · CONDUCTSECdetermination922024-08-143822NO SCHEME-WIDE RULEREVIEW
Excluded on Sustain Labs but not by scheme
115,47220247,500not computable
Reported carbon
Scope 1 + 2
115,472 tCO₂e
Intensity
no intensity — revenue is not reported for this company
Scope 1
39,292 tCO₂e
Scope 2 · location-based
76,179 tCO₂e
Scope 3
7,500 tCO₂e
Reporting year
—
Disclosure level
Full
Assurance
no assurance statement
no assurance statement — WBA publishes none for any company, so this is the absence of a statement, not a failed audit
Emissions are carried beside the bands and never inside them. Nothing on this panel moved the band above.
Adverse — adjudicated determinations, five-year window to 2026-09-01
G · GovernanceSEC · determination · severity 92 · 2024-08-14sets the band
G · GovernanceSEC · consent · severity 45 · 2024-09-17
G · GovernanceFRB · consent · severity 65 · 2024-10-09 · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
Positive — registry and self-reported
Nothing on file.
The band above is a lookup on published rules, each fired by one stated fact — never a weighted average of these two columns. The rule that fired is stated here: on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2024-08-14.
Why this band. on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2024-08-14
This scheme’s exclusion. No scheme-wide rule: no UNGC rule. The record is the company's; there is no scheme exclusion for it to engage.
Why review. Determination SEC ruling (2024) meets our exclusion bar. The scheme publishes no scheme-wide UN Global Compact exclusion to reach it.
Determined 382 days before the holdings date. 2 final determinations inside the window.
▸ NM FORD MOTOR CO News monitored: 4 mentions0.07%—EXCLUDED · CONDUCTDG COMPdetermination912025-04-011525NO SCHEME-WIDE RULEREVIEW
Excluded on Sustain Labs but not by scheme
2,380,0002024248,000,00013
Reported carbon
Scope 1 + 2
2,380,000 tCO₂e
Intensity
12.9 tCO₂e / $m revenue
Scope 1
870,091 tCO₂e
Scope 2 · location-based
2,076,700 tCO₂e
Scope 3
248,000,000 tCO₂e
Reporting year
2024
Disclosure level
Full
Assurance
no assurance statement
Scope 2 here is the location-based figure from WBA's climate profile. The reported Scope 1+2 above it uses a market-based Scope 2, so the two do not add up and are not meant to: they are different accounting bases, not a discrepancy. WBA labels neither, so this is read from the arithmetic — the profile's Scope 1 agrees with the aggregate on every company, and the residual differs only where the company buys renewable instruments.
no assurance statement — WBA publishes none for any company, so this is the absence of a statement, not a failed audit
Emissions are carried beside the bands and never inside them. Nothing on this panel moved the band above.
Flags — shown, never scored
A sanctions flag means the company appears on that list, matched by identifier; news mentions are monitored coverage from GDELT. Neither changes the band or can exclude a company.
Adverse — adjudicated determinations, five-year window to 2026-09-01
G · GovernanceDGCOMP · determination · severity 91 · 2025-04-01sets the band
E · EnvironmentEPA · litigated · severity 82 · 2022-09-29
E · EnvironmentEPA · consent · severity 58 · 2025-05-01
E · EnvironmentEPA · consent · severity 50 · 2021-09-30
E · EnvironmentEPA · consent · severity 50 · 2024-08-09
G · GovernanceCMA · litigated · severity 86 · 2025-05-16 · final presumed · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
G · GovernanceDOJ · consent · severity 68 · 2024-03-11 · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
Positive — registry and self-reported
sbti validated target · 2021-03-31 · registry
1.5°C/Well-below 2°C · net zero: Commitment removed
SBTi publishes no per-company page; the target dashboard is a search over the free export. The SBTi target-dashboard company id is 40002522.
https://sciencebasedtargets.org/companies-taking-action
modern slavery statement · 2026-03-18 · reported_unassured
ungc participant · 2008-05-01 · reported_unassured
The band above is a lookup on published rules, each fired by one stated fact — never a weighted average of these two columns. The rule that fired is stated here: on the exclusion bar — DGCOMP determination, 2025-04-01.
Why this band. on the exclusion bar — DGCOMP determination, 2025-04-01
This scheme’s exclusion. No scheme-wide rule: no UNGC rule. The record is the company's; there is no scheme exclusion for it to engage.
Why review. Determination DG COMP ruling (2025) meets our exclusion bar. The scheme publishes no scheme-wide UN Global Compact exclusion to reach it.
Determined 152 days before the holdings date. 5 final determinations inside the window.
▸ NM TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP0.07%—EXCLUDED · CONDUCTSECdetermination922024-08-143821NO SCHEME-WIDE RULEREVIEW
Excluded on Sustain Labs but not by scheme
135,8902024not reportednot computable
Reported carbon
Scope 1 + 2
135,890 tCO₂e
Intensity
no intensity — revenue is not reported for this company
Scope 1
13,382 tCO₂e
Scope 2 · location-based
122,508 tCO₂e
Scope 3
not reported tCO₂e
Reporting year
—
Disclosure level
Basic
Assurance
no assurance statement
no assurance statement — WBA publishes none for any company, so this is the absence of a statement, not a failed audit
WBA records this company as owing scopes it has not published: S3.15.
Emissions are carried beside the bands and never inside them. Nothing on this panel moved the band above.
Adverse — adjudicated determinations, five-year window to 2026-09-01
G · GovernanceSEC · determination · severity 92 · 2024-08-14sets the band
G · GovernanceDOJ · consent · severity 66 · 2024-10-21 · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
G · GovernanceDOJ · consent · severity 66 · 2024-10-21 · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
Positive — registry and self-reported
Nothing on file.
The band above is a lookup on published rules, each fired by one stated fact — never a weighted average of these two columns. The rule that fired is stated here: on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2024-08-14.
Why this band. on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2024-08-14
This scheme’s exclusion. No scheme-wide rule: no UNGC rule. The record is the company's; there is no scheme exclusion for it to engage.
Why review. Determination SEC ruling (2024) meets our exclusion bar. The scheme publishes no scheme-wide UN Global Compact exclusion to reach it.
Determined 382 days before the holdings date. 1 final determination inside the window.
▸ NM ABB LTD0.06%—EXCLUDED · CONDUCTDOJdetermination992022-06-301,1585NO SCHEME-WIDE RULEREVIEW
Excluded on Sustain Labs but not by scheme
138,0002024394,952,0004
Reported carbon
Scope 1 + 2
138,000 tCO₂e
Intensity
4.2 tCO₂e / $m revenue
Scope 1
119,000 tCO₂e
Scope 2 · location-based
286,000 tCO₂e
Scope 3
394,952,000 tCO₂e
Reporting year
2024
Disclosure level
Relevant
Assurance
no assurance statement
Scope 2 here is the location-based figure from WBA's climate profile. The reported Scope 1+2 above it uses a market-based Scope 2, so the two do not add up and are not meant to: they are different accounting bases, not a discrepancy. WBA labels neither, so this is read from the arithmetic — the profile's Scope 1 agrees with the aggregate on every company, and the residual differs only where the company buys renewable instruments.
no assurance statement — WBA publishes none for any company, so this is the absence of a statement, not a failed audit
Emissions are carried beside the bands and never inside them. Nothing on this panel moved the band above.
Adverse — adjudicated determinations, five-year window to 2026-09-01
G · GovernanceDOJ · determination · severity 99 · 2022-06-30sets the band
G · GovernanceSEC · determination · severity 97 · 2022-12-03
E · EnvironmentEPA · consent · severity 50 · 2023-12-05
G · GovernanceDOJ · consent · severity 68 · 2022-12-02 · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
Positive — registry and self-reported
sbti validated target · 2024-06-27 · registry
1.5°C · net zero: Targets set · long term: Targets set
SBTi publishes no per-company page; the target dashboard is a search over the free export. The SBTi target-dashboard company id is 40006850.
https://sciencebasedtargets.org/companies-taking-action
ungc participant · 2000-07-26 · reported_unassured
The band above is a lookup on published rules, each fired by one stated fact — never a weighted average of these two columns. The rule that fired is stated here: on the exclusion bar — DOJ determination, 2022-06-30.
Why this band. on the exclusion bar — DOJ determination, 2022-06-30
This scheme’s exclusion. No scheme-wide rule: no UNGC rule. The record is the company's; there is no scheme exclusion for it to engage.
Why review. Determination DOJ ruling (2022) meets our exclusion bar. The scheme publishes no scheme-wide UN Global Compact exclusion to reach it.
Determined 1,158 days before the holdings date. 5 final determinations inside the window.
▸ NM THOR INDUSTRIES INC0.06%—EXCLUDED · CONDUCTSEClitigated792023-10-196821NO SCHEME-WIDE RULEREVIEW
Excluded on Sustain Labs but not by scheme
not heldnot heldnot held
Reported carbon
This company does not appear in the WBA climate download, so we hold no reported emissions figure for it. That is an absence of disclosure we can see, not a low number.
Adverse — adjudicated determinations, five-year window to 2026-09-01
G · GovernanceSEC · litigated · severity 79 · 2023-10-19sets the band
Positive — registry and self-reported
sbti validated target · 2023-10-26 · registry
1.5°C · net zero: Targets set · long term: Targets set
SBTi publishes no per-company page; the target dashboard is a search over the free export. The SBTi target-dashboard company id is 40012117.
https://sciencebasedtargets.org/companies-taking-action
ungc participant · 2019-10-28 · reported_unassured
The band above is a lookup on published rules, each fired by one stated fact — never a weighted average of these two columns. The rule that fired is stated here: on the exclusion bar — SEC litigated determination, 2023-10-19.
Why this band. on the exclusion bar — SEC litigated determination, 2023-10-19
This scheme’s exclusion. No scheme-wide rule: no UNGC rule. The record is the company's; there is no scheme exclusion for it to engage.
Why review. Litigated SEC ruling (2023) meets our exclusion bar. The scheme publishes no scheme-wide UN Global Compact exclusion to reach it.
Determined 682 days before the holdings date. 1 final determination inside the window.
▸ NM JPMORGAN CHASE & CO News monitored: 18 mentions0.05%—EXCLUDED · CONDUCTSECdetermination922021-12-171,35310NO SCHEME-WIDE RULEREVIEW
Excluded on Sustain Labs but not by scheme
907,7732023not reportednot computable
Reported carbon
Scope 1 + 2
907,773 tCO₂e
Intensity
no intensity — revenue is not reported for this company
Scope 1
115,294 tCO₂e
Scope 2 · location-based
792,479 tCO₂e
Scope 3
not reported tCO₂e
Reporting year
—
Disclosure level
Basic
Assurance
no assurance statement
no assurance statement — WBA publishes none for any company, so this is the absence of a statement, not a failed audit
WBA records this company as owing scopes it has not published: S3.15.
Emissions are carried beside the bands and never inside them. Nothing on this panel moved the band above.
Flags — shown, never scored
A sanctions flag means the company appears on that list, matched by identifier; news mentions are monitored coverage from GDELT. Neither changes the band or can exclude a company.
Adverse — adjudicated determinations, five-year window to 2026-09-01
G · GovernanceSEC · determination · severity 92 · 2021-12-17sets the band
G · GovernanceDGCOMP · litigated · severity 84 · 2021-12-02
G · GovernanceSEC · consent · severity 45 · 2024-10-31
G · GovernanceSEC · consent · severity 45 · 2024-10-31
G · GovernanceSEC · consent · severity 45 · 2024-10-31
G · GovernanceSEC · consent · severity 45 · 2024-10-31
G · GovernanceOCC · consent · severity 66 · 2024-03-14 · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
G · GovernanceFRB · consent · severity 64 · 2024-03-08 · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
G · GovernanceOCC · consent · severity 56 · 2024-03-14 · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
4 further determinations in the window, not shown
Positive — registry and self-reported
ungc participant · 2021-09-22 · reported_unassured
The band above is a lookup on published rules, each fired by one stated fact — never a weighted average of these two columns. The rule that fired is stated here: on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2021-12-17.
Why this band. on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2021-12-17
This scheme’s exclusion. No scheme-wide rule: no UNGC rule. The record is the company's; there is no scheme exclusion for it to engage.
Why review. Determination SEC ruling (2021) meets our exclusion bar. The scheme publishes no scheme-wide UN Global Compact exclusion to reach it.
Determined 1,353 days before the holdings date. 10 final determinations inside the window.
▸ NM INTESA SANPAOLO SPA News monitored: 2 mentions0.05%—EXCLUDED · CONDUCTSECdetermination922024-09-243411NO SCHEME-WIDE RULEREVIEW
Excluded on Sustain Labs but not by scheme
61,936202420,400,000not computable
Reported carbon
Scope 1 + 2
61,936 tCO₂e
Intensity
no intensity — revenue is not reported for this company
Scope 1
45,280 tCO₂e
Scope 2 · location-based
115,789 tCO₂e
Scope 3
20,400,000 tCO₂e
Reporting year
—
Disclosure level
Full
Assurance
no assurance statement
Scope 2 here is the location-based figure from WBA's climate profile. The reported Scope 1+2 above it uses a market-based Scope 2, so the two do not add up and are not meant to: they are different accounting bases, not a discrepancy. WBA labels neither, so this is read from the arithmetic — the profile's Scope 1 agrees with the aggregate on every company, and the residual differs only where the company buys renewable instruments.
no assurance statement — WBA publishes none for any company, so this is the absence of a statement, not a failed audit
Emissions are carried beside the bands and never inside them. Nothing on this panel moved the band above.
Flags — shown, never scored
A sanctions flag means the company appears on that list, matched by identifier; news mentions are monitored coverage from GDELT. Neither changes the band or can exclude a company.
Adverse — adjudicated determinations, five-year window to 2026-09-01
G · GovernanceSEC · determination · severity 92 · 2024-09-24sets the band
Positive — registry and self-reported
sbti validated target · 2025-02-13 · registry
1.5°C · net zero: Committed
SBTi publishes no per-company page; the target dashboard is a search over the free export. The SBTi target-dashboard company id is 40015758.
https://sciencebasedtargets.org/companies-taking-action
modern slavery statement · 2026-03-26 · reported_unassured
ungc participant · 2003-04-24 · reported_unassured
The band above is a lookup on published rules, each fired by one stated fact — never a weighted average of these two columns. The rule that fired is stated here: on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2024-09-24.
Why this band. on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2024-09-24
This scheme’s exclusion. No scheme-wide rule: no UNGC rule. The record is the company's; there is no scheme exclusion for it to engage.
Why review. Determination SEC ruling (2024) meets our exclusion bar. The scheme publishes no scheme-wide UN Global Compact exclusion to reach it.
Determined 341 days before the holdings date. 1 final determination inside the window.
▸ NM BNP PARIBAS0.04%—EXCLUDED · CONDUCTSECdetermination922023-08-087541NO SCHEME-WIDE RULEREVIEW
Excluded on Sustain Labs but not by scheme
152,9232024104,155,188not computable
Reported carbon
Scope 1 + 2
152,923 tCO₂e
Intensity
no intensity — revenue is not reported for this company
Scope 1
23,587 tCO₂e
Scope 2 · location-based
129,336 tCO₂e
Scope 3
104,155,188 tCO₂e
Reporting year
—
Disclosure level
Full
Assurance
no assurance statement
no assurance statement — WBA publishes none for any company, so this is the absence of a statement, not a failed audit
Emissions are carried beside the bands and never inside them. Nothing on this panel moved the band above.
Adverse — adjudicated determinations, five-year window to 2026-09-01
G · GovernanceSEC · determination · severity 92 · 2023-08-08sets the band
Positive — registry and self-reported
modern slavery statement · 2026-04-29 · reported_unassured
ungc participant · 2004-02-10 · reported_unassured
The band above is a lookup on published rules, each fired by one stated fact — never a weighted average of these two columns. The rule that fired is stated here: on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2023-08-08.
Why this band. on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2023-08-08
This scheme’s exclusion. No scheme-wide rule: no UNGC rule. The record is the company's; there is no scheme exclusion for it to engage.
Why review. Determination SEC ruling (2023) meets our exclusion bar. The scheme publishes no scheme-wide UN Global Compact exclusion to reach it.
Determined 754 days before the holdings date. 1 final determination inside the window.
▸ NM COMCAST CORP News monitored: 21 mentions0.04%—EXCLUDED · CONDUCTAGCMlitigated852023-06-287957NO SCHEME-WIDE RULEREVIEW
Excluded on Sustain Labs but not by scheme
1,540,00020245,152,00012
Reported carbon
Scope 1 + 2
1,540,000 tCO₂e
Intensity
12.4 tCO₂e / $m revenue
Scope 1
413,000 tCO₂e
Scope 2 · location-based
1,489,000 tCO₂e
Scope 3
5,152,000 tCO₂e
Reporting year
2024
Disclosure level
Full
Assurance
no assurance statement
Scope 2 here is the location-based figure from WBA's climate profile. The reported Scope 1+2 above it uses a market-based Scope 2, so the two do not add up and are not meant to: they are different accounting bases, not a discrepancy. WBA labels neither, so this is read from the arithmetic — the profile's Scope 1 agrees with the aggregate on every company, and the residual differs only where the company buys renewable instruments.
no assurance statement — WBA publishes none for any company, so this is the absence of a statement, not a failed audit
Emissions are carried beside the bands and never inside them. Nothing on this panel moved the band above.
Flags — shown, never scored
A sanctions flag means the company appears on that list, matched by identifier; news mentions are monitored coverage from GDELT. Neither changes the band or can exclude a company.
Adverse — adjudicated determinations, five-year window to 2026-09-01
E · EnvironmentEPA · consent · severity 58 · 2023-10-03
S · SocialMSHA · consent · severity 54 · 2025-05-09
MSHA publishes no per-docket page; FMSHRC indexes decisions by date and party. Look the docket up in CivilPenaltyDocketsDecisions.
The citation is LAKE 2025-0046.
MSHA lookup →
S · SocialMSHA · final uncontested · severity 36 · 2023-11-24
MSHA publishes no per-citation page. The citations are in the AssessedViolations dataset.
The citation is 003226-2023.
MSHA publishes no page for this case — it is carried from the bulk dataset
S · SocialMSHA · final uncontested · severity 35 · 2021-12-20
MSHA publishes no per-citation page. The citations are in the AssessedViolations dataset.
The citation is 003226-2021.
MSHA lookup →
S · SocialMSHA · final uncontested · severity 35 · 2022-12-17
MSHA publishes no per-citation page. The citations are in the AssessedViolations dataset.
The citation is 003226-2022.
MSHA publishes no page for this case — it is carried from the bulk dataset
G · GovernanceAGCM · litigated · severity 85 · 2025-11-18 · final presumed · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
G · GovernanceAGCM · litigated · severity 84 · 2022-03-01 · final presumed · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
G · GovernanceCMA · litigated · severity 82 · 2025-03-21 · final presumed · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
1 further determinations in the window, not shown
Positive — registry and self-reported
sbti validated target · 2025-04-24 · registry
1.5°C
SBTi publishes no per-company page; the target dashboard is a search over the free export. The SBTi target-dashboard company id is 40005901.
https://sciencebasedtargets.org/companies-taking-action
sbti validated target · 2023-11-23 · registry
1.5°C
SBTi publishes no per-company page; the target dashboard is a search over the free export. The SBTi target-dashboard company id is 40007303.
https://sciencebasedtargets.org/companies-taking-action
modern slavery statement · 2026-06-24 · reported_unassured
ungc participant · 2023-01-16 · reported_unassured
The band above is a lookup on published rules, each fired by one stated fact — never a weighted average of these two columns. The rule that fired is stated here: on the exclusion bar — AGCM litigated determination, 2023-06-28.
Why this band. on the exclusion bar — AGCM litigated determination, 2023-06-28
This scheme’s exclusion. No scheme-wide rule: no UNGC rule. The record is the company's; there is no scheme exclusion for it to engage.
Why review. Litigated AGCM ruling (2023) meets our exclusion bar. The scheme publishes no scheme-wide UN Global Compact exclusion to reach it.
Determined 795 days before the holdings date. 7 final determinations inside the window.
▸ NM DEUTSCHE BANK AG News monitored: 23 mentions0.03%—EXCLUDED · CONDUCTSECdetermination922022-09-271,0695NO SCHEME-WIDE RULEREVIEW
Excluded on Sustain Labs but not by scheme
33,3342024not reportednot computable
Reported carbon
Scope 1 + 2
33,334 tCO₂e
Intensity
no intensity — revenue is not reported for this company
Scope 1
16,978 tCO₂e
Scope 2 · location-based
99,164 tCO₂e
Scope 3
not reported tCO₂e
Reporting year
—
Disclosure level
Basic
Assurance
no assurance statement
Scope 2 here is the location-based figure from WBA's climate profile. The reported Scope 1+2 above it uses a market-based Scope 2, so the two do not add up and are not meant to: they are different accounting bases, not a discrepancy. WBA labels neither, so this is read from the arithmetic — the profile's Scope 1 agrees with the aggregate on every company, and the residual differs only where the company buys renewable instruments.
no assurance statement — WBA publishes none for any company, so this is the absence of a statement, not a failed audit
WBA records this company as owing scopes it has not published: S3.15.
Emissions are carried beside the bands and never inside them. Nothing on this panel moved the band above.
Flags — shown, never scored
A sanctions flag means the company appears on that list, matched by identifier; news mentions are monitored coverage from GDELT. Neither changes the band or can exclude a company.
Adverse — adjudicated determinations, five-year window to 2026-09-01
G · GovernanceSEC · determination · severity 92 · 2022-09-27sets the band
G · GovernanceDGCOMP · litigated · severity 84 · 2023-11-22
G · GovernanceSEC · consent · severity 45 · 2024-12-20
G · GovernanceSEC · consent · severity 45 · 2023-09-25
G · GovernanceSEC · consent · severity 45 · 2023-09-25
G · GovernanceCMA · litigated · severity 86 · 2025-07-16 · final presumed · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
G · GovernanceAGCM · litigated · severity 84 · 2021-09-07 · final presumed · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
G · GovernanceFRB · consent · severity 65 · 2023-07-13 · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
G · GovernanceOFSI · consent · severity 57 · 2026-05-19 · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
Positive — registry and self-reported
modern slavery statement · 2026-06-29 · reported_unassured
ungc participant · 2000-07-26 · reported_unassured
Independent — measured or assessed by a third party, not adjudicated
S · SocialIndependent estimate · not adjudicated · OSHA ITA (statutory return) · osha fatalities · severity 80 · 2024-12-31
OSHA's ITA 300A publication is annual self-reported summary data with no inspection number and no per-establishment page.
The citation is 015576-2024.
OSHA ITA (statutory return) lookup →
An independent estimate informs the pillar it is about and is shown here with its source; it is not a determination and it can never exclude a company.
The band above is a lookup on published rules, each fired by one stated fact — never a weighted average of these two columns. The rule that fired is stated here: on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2022-09-27.
Why this band. on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2022-09-27
This scheme’s exclusion. No scheme-wide rule: no UNGC rule. The record is the company's; there is no scheme exclusion for it to engage.
Why review. Determination SEC ruling (2022) meets our exclusion bar. The scheme publishes no scheme-wide UN Global Compact exclusion to reach it.
Determined 1,069 days before the holdings date. 5 final determinations inside the window.
▸ NM BANK OF AMERICA CORP0.02%—EXCLUDED · CONDUCTSECdetermination922022-09-271,0692NO SCHEME-WIDE RULEREVIEW
Excluded on Sustain Labs but not by scheme
678,0632023not reportednot computable
Reported carbon
Scope 1 + 2
678,063 tCO₂e
Intensity
no intensity — revenue is not reported for this company
Scope 1
68,050 tCO₂e
Scope 2 · location-based
610,013 tCO₂e
Scope 3
not reported tCO₂e
Reporting year
—
Disclosure level
Full
Assurance
no assurance statement
no assurance statement — WBA publishes none for any company, so this is the absence of a statement, not a failed audit
Emissions are carried beside the bands and never inside them. Nothing on this panel moved the band above.
Adverse — adjudicated determinations, five-year window to 2026-09-01
G · GovernanceSEC · determination · severity 92 · 2022-09-27sets the band
E · EnvironmentEPA · consent · severity 58 · 2023-07-31
G · GovernanceOCC · consent · severity 65 · 2022-07-14 · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
G · GovernanceDOJ · consent · severity 64 · 2025-09-18 · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
G · GovernanceOCC · consent · severity 63 · 2023-07-05 · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
G · GovernanceOCC · consent · severity 56 · 2024-12-23 · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
Positive — registry and self-reported
modern slavery statement · 2026-06-24 · reported_unassured
ungc participant · 2016-11-21 · reported_unassured
The band above is a lookup on published rules, each fired by one stated fact — never a weighted average of these two columns. The rule that fired is stated here: on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2022-09-27.
Why this band. on the exclusion bar — SEC determination, 2022-09-27
This scheme’s exclusion. No scheme-wide rule: no UNGC rule. The record is the company's; there is no scheme exclusion for it to engage.
Why review. Determination SEC ruling (2022) meets our exclusion bar. The scheme publishes no scheme-wide UN Global Compact exclusion to reach it.
Determined 1,069 days before the holdings date. 2 final determinations inside the window.
▸ NM CHEVRON CORP News monitored: 49 mentions0.02%—EXCLUDED · CONDUCTEPAlitigated822023-09-1971214NO SCHEME-WIDE RULEREVIEW
Excluded on Sustain Labs but not by scheme
58,000,0002024717,000,000286
Reported carbon
Scope 1 + 2
58,000,000 tCO₂e
Intensity
286.0 tCO₂e / $m revenue
Scope 1
54,000,000 tCO₂e
Scope 2 · location-based
4,000,000 tCO₂e
Scope 3
717,000,000 tCO₂e
Reporting year
2024
Disclosure level
Full
Assurance
no assurance statement
no assurance statement — WBA publishes none for any company, so this is the absence of a statement, not a failed audit
Emissions are carried beside the bands and never inside them. Nothing on this panel moved the band above.
Flags — shown, never scored
A sanctions flag means the company appears on that list, matched by identifier; news mentions are monitored coverage from GDELT. Neither changes the band or can exclude a company.
Adverse — adjudicated determinations, five-year window to 2026-09-01
E · EnvironmentEPA · litigated · severity 82 · 2023-09-19sets the band
E · EnvironmentEPA · litigated · severity 82 · 2022-09-29
E · EnvironmentEPA · consent · severity 67 · 2025-02-12
E · EnvironmentEPA · consent · severity 66 · 2022-12-01
E · EnvironmentEPA · consent · severity 60 · 2025-10-02
E · EnvironmentEPA · consent · severity 59 · 2022-01-26
G · GovernanceDOJ · consent · severity 65 · 2026-03-11 · not confirmed final — cannot exclude
8 further determinations in the window, not shown
Positive — registry and self-reported
Nothing on file.
The band above is a lookup on published rules, each fired by one stated fact — never a weighted average of these two columns. The rule that fired is stated here: on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2023-09-19.
Why this band. on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2023-09-19
This scheme’s exclusion. No scheme-wide rule: no UNGC rule. The record is the company's; there is no scheme exclusion for it to engage.
Why review. Litigated EPA ruling (2023) meets our exclusion bar. The scheme publishes no scheme-wide UN Global Compact exclusion to reach it.
Determined 712 days before the holdings date. 14 final determinations inside the window.
▸ NM COLGATE-PALMOLIVE CO0.02%—EXCLUDED · CONDUCTEPAlitigated822022-09-291,0678NO SCHEME-WIDE RULEREVIEW
Excluded on Sustain Labs but not by scheme
399,000202341,749,00020
Reported carbon
Scope 1 + 2
399,000 tCO₂e
Intensity
19.8 tCO₂e / $m revenue
Scope 1
218,000 tCO₂e
Scope 2 · location-based
384,000 tCO₂e
Scope 3
41,749,000 tCO₂e
Reporting year
2023 emissions over 2024 revenue
Disclosure level
Full
Assurance
no assurance statement
Scope 2 here is the location-based figure from WBA's climate profile. The reported Scope 1+2 above it uses a market-based Scope 2, so the two do not add up and are not meant to: they are different accounting bases, not a discrepancy. WBA labels neither, so this is read from the arithmetic — the profile's Scope 1 agrees with the aggregate on every company, and the residual differs only where the company buys renewable instruments.
no assurance statement — WBA publishes none for any company, so this is the absence of a statement, not a failed audit
The intensity pairs two different years: WBA publishes revenue for 2024 only, so an earlier emissions year is divided by 2024 revenue rather than left out.
Emissions are carried beside the bands and never inside them. Nothing on this panel moved the band above.
Adverse — adjudicated determinations, five-year window to 2026-09-01
E · EnvironmentEPA · litigated · severity 82 · 2022-09-29sets the band
E · EnvironmentEPA · consent · severity 64 · 2026-08-31
E · EnvironmentEPA · consent · severity 50 · 2022-05-05
E · EnvironmentEPA · consent · severity 50 · 2022-05-05
E · EnvironmentEPA · consent · severity 50 · 2024-09-19
E · EnvironmentEPA · consent · severity 50 · 2022-05-05
2 further determinations in the window, not shown
Positive — registry and self-reported
sbti validated target · 2022-10-06 · registry
1.5°C · net zero: Targets set · long term: Targets set
SBTi publishes no per-company page; the target dashboard is a search over the free export. The SBTi target-dashboard company id is 40013763.
https://sciencebasedtargets.org/companies-taking-action
ungc participant · 2017-05-01 · reported_unassured
The band above is a lookup on published rules, each fired by one stated fact — never a weighted average of these two columns. The rule that fired is stated here: on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2022-09-29.
Why this band. on the exclusion bar — EPA litigated determination, 2022-09-29
This scheme’s exclusion. No scheme-wide rule: no UNGC rule. The record is the company's; there is no scheme exclusion for it to engage.
Why review. Litigated EPA ruling (2022) meets our exclusion bar. The scheme publishes no scheme-wide UN Global Compact exclusion to reach it.
Determined 1,067 days before the holdings date. 8 final determinations inside the window.

223 more holdings in this report

Enter a work email for the full report on data as at 30 June 2026: every holding with the determination behind it, the regulator, the date and a link to the source record.

Review is fired by the first of five rules that matches: excluded on Sustain Labs where the scheme’s exclusion does not reach the determination; excluded on Sustain Labs where it does; a critical finding; 2 or more final determinations in the window; one final determination within 24 months of the holdings date. A single determination older than that, below the critical floor, carries no marker.
Days is the gap between the determination and the holdings date — the period in which the fund had the opportunity to act. Filed proceedings are carried in the record but never fire a band: an allegation is not a determination.
Carbon feed 2026-09-07-metrics-rev2 (2026-09-07) — 797 of 2,000 companies in the source carry reported Scope 1+2 — 838 companies reach this report. Scope figures are reported Scope 1+2 only; a holding without one reads not reported, never zero.
About this data · 6 data sources, all on schedule
SourceData as ofRefreshCompanies in this report
Climate TRACE power-sector inventory independent estimate, not adjudicated
Climate TRACE power-sector inventory — independent estimate, not adjudicated climate_trace/2026-09-28 (fetched 2026-09-28, 14 days old; within the 45-day cadence allowance) — 308 of 1,349 controlling-parent fleets join a listed company on LEI; every row is an independent estimate and never excludes — 37 companies reach this report.
2026-09-28
14 days old
On schedule (every 45 days)37
CNIL sanctions (press stream)
CNIL sanctions (press stream) cnil/2026-10-12 (fetched 2026-10-12, today; within the 10-day cadence allowance) — 6 of 17 decision rows resolve to a listed company (11 name matches no listed company) — 5 companies reach this report.
2026-10-12
today
On schedule (every 10 days)5
Irish DPC decisions
Irish DPC decisions dpc_ireland/2026-09-16 (fetched 2026-09-16, 26 days old; within the 120-day cadence allowance) — 19 of 62 decision rows resolve to a listed company (41 name matches no listed company, 2 core rung on a single token refused) — 5 companies reach this report.
2026-09-16
26 days old
On schedule (every 120 days)5
EDPB Article 60 register (fine decisions)
EDPB Article 60 register (fine decisions) edpb/2026-10-08 (fetched 2026-10-08, 4 days old; within the 10-day cadence allowance) — 42 of 207 decision rows resolve to a listed company (93 no name in fetched text, 65 name matches no listed company, 4 core rung on a single token refused, 2 false match suppressed, 1 name reaches more than one company) — 5 companies reach this report.
2026-10-08
4 days old
On schedule (every 10 days)5
Garante provvedimenti
Garante provvedimenti garante/2026-10-12 (fetched 2026-10-12, today; within the 10-day cadence allowance) — 6 of 18 decision rows resolve to a listed company (6 name matches no listed company, 6 no name in fetched text) — 5 companies reach this report.
2026-10-12
today
On schedule (every 10 days)5
MDB sanctions lists (IDB, ADB, EBRD)
MDB sanctions lists (IDB, ADB, EBRD) mdb_registers/2026-10-12 (fetched 2026-10-12, today; within the 60-day cadence allowance) — 684 of 5,330 register rows are a bank's own determination against a firm — 1 of the 684 resolve to a listed company (683 dropped, 0 of them carrying an ISIN or LEI) — 1 company reaches this report.
2026-10-12
today
On schedule (every 60 days)1